Saturday, March 1, 2008

We Won't See a Nader-Obama-Clinton Debate

Nader's platform is vast and targets the issues that truly effect Americans - specifically the ones Barack, Hillary and the Democratic Party have refused to address - apologies to Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.

In a recent article with CounterPunch News Magazine, Ralph detailed a series of questions he would like to ask Barack and Hillary if he were to appear in a debate with either of them.


Following are the questions he proposed in the article.

"Senator Clinton, you represent New York, which includes the large banking, brokerage and investment firms colloquially called Wall Street. Eliot Spitzer became governor of your state largely on his widely reported reputation for prosecuting corporate crooks who fleeced investors, pensioners and workers of hundreds of billions of dollars. He often remarked that the federal criminal laws were too weak and the Securities and Exchange Commission was too lenient.

"As the Senator from New York, what specifically have you done to advance a strong crackdown on corporate crime with tougher laws and larger enforcement budgets? And, specifically, what do you intend to do as President?"

"Senator Obama, you have often spoken about your health insurance plan as a way to reduce costs. Yet you do not discuss three major cost reduction opportunities. The GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, estimates that ten per cent of the entire health expenditures in this country go down the drain due to computerized billing fraud and abuse. This year, that amounts to $220 billion.

"Under a single payer plan, administrative expenses would be cut by about two-thirds. That would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars a year in savings. And the Harvard School of Public Health study estimates about 80,000 people die every year from medical malpractice in hospitals, estimating costs years ago of $60 billion a year. These are large savings in a $2.2 trillion a year health care industry.

"Do you agree and, if so, why have you ignored proposing practical actions in these areas?"

"Senator Clinton, you have long urged more money for children's programs. One way to make this possible is to end or diminish the complex system of corporate welfare-subsidies, handouts, giveaways and bailouts of business corporations. These amount to hundreds of billions of dollars a year, directly and through tax loopholes. Why have you not moved against such spending so that some of the money may go to help needy children? And specifically, what would you do as President to develop standards curtailing runaway corporate welfare programs pushed by corporate lobbyists?"

If you're not willing to vote for Ralph but you agree with his political ambitions, be sure to write Barack and Hillary and demand that they address these issues. They are critical to us as a people and are paramount in fixing the problems that we face as a nation.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Saw your link over at Malloy's site. You seem to be among those not buying the party line about how we must be patient, things take time, be realistic, etc.
It did not take the corporate scam artists long to destroy the few vestiges of liberty which might have been found in the courts, the legislature or the executive.

Presto! 3 trillion dollars spent enriching a gang of murderous thieves as they lead the mob in pursuit of "terrorists".
A nation informed only of entertainment, media which is so insubstantial that it is painful to watch, a society of surface and little substance.
Glad I checked this site out.
Don Smith

Zach said...

Thank you for the kind words. I'll attempt to keep the blog informative and maybe even entertaining. You're welcome to visit and comment as frequently as you'd like.

I'd like this blog to become one that is frequented by intelligent minds who are willing to discuss the issues that truly matter to us as a people.

-Zach